WFD Template Definition
Template short name: WFD_CWBODYSTATUS, Name: WFD_CoastalWatersStatus, Geometry type: None
No.
Attribute
Attribute short name
Definition
Type
Obligation
Attribute values
Origin
0.0
TEMPLATE
Name der Schablone. Darf nicht veraendert werden
string (24)
Mandatory
1.0
EU_CD_CW
Internationaler Schluessel fuer CostalWaterBody. Wird zusammengesetzt aus demMemberStateCode, dem 2-stelligen Schluessel fuer die Feature class des Surface WaterBody Typs(z.B.:RW) und dem MemberStateCode_RW (Erlaeuterung s. MS_CD_RW). Schema: <MemberStateCode>_ <FeatureClassCode>_ <MS_CD_RW>
string (42)
Mandatory, primary key
2.0
RBD_CD
4-digit code fuer die Flussgebietseinheit.
string (4)
Mandatory
2.1
WA_CD
4-digit code fuer die Working Area.
string (10)
Mandatory
2.2
LAND_CD
Der CountryStateCode wird in Anlehnung an die Regelungen der DIN EN ISO 3166-1 und DIN ISO 3166-2 aus zwei Alpha-2 Schluesseln zusammen gesetzt. Der erste Teil des Schluessels entspricht dem CountryCode, der zweite Schluesselbestandteil steht fuer die Verwaltungseinheiten (Bundesland). Fuer Deutschland sind diese Verwaltungseinheiten vorgegeben. Fuer andere Laender ist der Alpha-2 Schluessel (XX) frei waehlbar.
string (4)
Mandatory, primary key
2.4
INS_WHEN
Erstellungsdatum des Datensatzes
date (8)
Mandatory
YYYYMMDD
2.5
INS_BY
Anspechpartner
string (15)
Mandatory
2.6
METADATA
Der Name der Metadatendatei ist abhaengig vom hier erfassten Gebiet. Er kann auf vier verschiedene Arten gebildet werden. Er setzt sich zusammen aus der Kurzbezeichnung fuer die Schablone, dem CountryStateCode, dem WorkAreaCode oder dem RiverBasinDistrictCode und wird um die Dateinamenserweiterung XML ergaenzt. Alle Angaben sind in Grossbuchstaben auszufuehren.Schema: <TemplateShortName>_ <CountryStateCode>_ <WorkAreaCode>.XML or <TemplateShortName>_ <CountryStateCode>_ <RiverBasinDistrictCode>.XML or <TemplateShortName>_ <CountryStateCode>.XML or <TemplateShortName>_ <WorkAreaCode>.XML Beispiel: fuer Nordrhein-Westfalen fuer den Niederrhein: COMPATH_DENW_2800.XML fuer Nordrhein-Westfalen fuer den Rhein COMPATH_DENW_2000.XML fuer Nordrhein-Westfalen: COMPATH_DENW.XML fuer das Gesamtgebiet Niederrhein: COMPATH_2800.XML
string (255)
Mandatory
3.0.2
QE11VAL
Required. Indicate the results of the assessment of this QE for all relevant surface water categories. '1' = High status or maximum potential. '2' = Good status or potential. '3' = Moderate status or potential (for QE1) or less than good status or potential (for QE2 and QE3). '4' = Poor status or potential (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE1). '5' = Bad status or potential (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE1). 'MonitoredButNotUsed' = Monitored but no standard has been developed and/or the QE is not used for status assessment (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE2 or QE3). 'Unknown' = Unknown status or potential. 'Not applicable' = Not applicable If there is no monitoring information for this QE and/or status is unknown then select ' Unknown' from the enumeration list. If the QE is not applicable in the surface water category or type then select option 'Not applicable' from the enumeration list. Quality checks: Within-schema check: if surfaceWaterCategory is 'TeW' then 'Not applicable' must be selected. If qeCode is any quality element starting with QE1, the option 'MonitoredButNotUsed' is not valid. If qeCode is any quality element starting with QE2 or QE3, the options '4' and '5' are not valid.
string (1)
Mandatory
3.0.4
QE11MONP
If the QE was monitored and the classification was derived from the monitoring data available, indicate the year/period of the monitoring data which was used in the classification. LAWA-interne Festlegung: Es gelten das Datum bzw. die Jahre der Bewertung, nicht der Messung. Format: YYYY oder YYYY--YYYY.
string (10)
Conditional, mandatory for QE11VAL <> "8"
3.0.6
QE11CHANG
If information is available and there has been a change in classification since the second RBMP, report that change. If the status was reported as ‘Unknown’ in the second RBMP, report ‘Unknown2016’. Otherwise, report ‘No_information’. This covers all cases in which it is not possible to identify a change between the second and third RBMPs, for example for new water bodies.
string (1)
Conditional, mandatory for QE11VAL <> "8"
3.0.7
QE11COMP
If there has been a change in classification since the second RBMP, indicate whether the reported change in status or potential is considered as being due to: ‘Consistent change’ = A real change of status due to implementation of measures or to increased/decreased pressures.‘Inconsistent due to changes to monitoring’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in monitoring (site, methodology) since the second RBMP.‘Inconsistent due to changes to assessment methods’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in the assessment methods since the second RBMPs.‘Inconsistent due to changes to monitoring and assessment methods’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in monitoring (site, methodology) and the assessment methods since the second RBMPs.Quality checks: Conditional check: Report if and only if qeStatusOrPotentialChange is ’+2’, ‘+1’, ‘-1’ or ‘-2’.
string (1)
Conditional, mandatory for qeStatusOrPotential​Change = '+2', '+1', '-1' or '-2'.
3.1.2
QE12VAL
Required. Indicate the results of the assessment of this QE for all relevant surface water categories. '1' = High status or maximum potential. '2' = Good status or potential. '3' = Moderate status or potential (for QE1) or less than good status or potential (for QE2 and QE3). '4' = Poor status or potential (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE1). '5' = Bad status or potential (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE1). 'MonitoredButNotUsed' = Monitored but no standard has been developed and/or the QE is not used for status assessment (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE2 or QE3). 'Unknown' = Unknown status or potential. 'Not applicable' = Not applicable If there is no monitoring information for this QE and/or status is unknown then select ' Unknown' from the enumeration list. If the QE is not applicable in the surface water category or type then select option 'Not applicable' from the enumeration list. Quality checks: Within-schema check: if surfaceWaterCategory is 'TeW' then 'Not applicable' must be selected. If qeCode is any quality element starting with QE1, the option 'MonitoredButNotUsed' is not valid. If qeCode is any quality element starting with QE2 or QE3, the options '4' and '5' are not valid.
string (1)
Mandatory
3.1.4
QE12MONP
If the QE was monitored and the classification was derived from the monitoring data available, indicate the year/period of the monitoring data which was used in the classification. LAWA-interne Festlegung: Es gelten das Datum bzw. die Jahre der Bewertung, nicht der Messung. Format: YYYY oder YYYY--YYYY.
string (10)
Conditional, mandatory for QE12VAL <> "8"
3.1.6
QE12CHANG
If information is available and there has been a change in classification since the second RBMP, report that change. If the status was reported as ‘Unknown’ in the second RBMP, report ‘Unknown2016’. Otherwise, report ‘No_information’. This covers all cases in which it is not possible to identify a change between the second and third RBMPs, for example for new water bodies.
string (1)
Conditional, mandatory for QE12VAL <> "8"
3.1.7
QE12COMP
If there has been a change in classification since the second RBMP, indicate whether the reported change in status or potential is considered as being due to: ‘Consistent change’ = A real change of status due to implementation of measures or to increased/decreased pressures.‘Inconsistent due to changes to monitoring’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in monitoring (site, methodology) since the second RBMP.‘Inconsistent due to changes to assessment methods’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in the assessment methods since the second RBMPs.‘Inconsistent due to changes to monitoring and assessment methods’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in monitoring (site, methodology) and the assessment methods since the second RBMPs.Quality checks: Conditional check: Report if and only if qeStatusOrPotentialChange is ’+2’, ‘+1’, ‘-1’ or ‘-2’.
string (1)
Conditional, mandatory for qeStatusOrPotential​Change = '+2', '+1', '-1' or '-2'.
3.2.2
QE121VAL
Required. Indicate the results of the assessment of this QE for all relevant surface water categories. '1' = High status or maximum potential. '2' = Good status or potential. '3' = Moderate status or potential (for QE1) or less than good status or potential (for QE2 and QE3). '4' = Poor status or potential (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE1). '5' = Bad status or potential (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE1). 'MonitoredButNotUsed' = Monitored but no standard has been developed and/or the QE is not used for status assessment (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE2 or QE3). 'Unknown' = Unknown status or potential. 'Not applicable' = Not applicable If there is no monitoring information for this QE and/or status is unknown then select ' Unknown' from the enumeration list. If the QE is not applicable in the surface water category or type then select option 'Not applicable' from the enumeration list. Quality checks: Within-schema check: if surfaceWaterCategory is 'TeW' then 'Not applicable' must be selected. If qeCode is any quality element starting with QE1, the option 'MonitoredButNotUsed' is not valid. If qeCode is any quality element starting with QE2 or QE3, the options '4' and '5' are not valid.
string (1)
Optional
3.2.4
QE121MONP
If the QE was monitored and the classification was derived from the monitoring data available, indicate the year/period of the monitoring data which was used in the classification. LAWA-interne Festlegung: Es gelten das Datum bzw. die Jahre der Bewertung, nicht der Messung. Format: YYYY oder YYYY--YYYY.
string (10)
Conditional, mandatory for QE121VAL <> "8"
3.2.6
QE121CHANG
If information is available and there has been a change in classification since the second RBMP, report that change. If the status was reported as ‘Unknown’ in the second RBMP, report ‘Unknown2016’. Otherwise, report ‘No_information’. This covers all cases in which it is not possible to identify a change between the second and third RBMPs, for example for new water bodies.
string (1)
Conditional, mandatory for QE121VAL <> "8"
3.2.7
QE121COMP
If there has been a change in classification since the second RBMP, indicate whether the reported change in status or potential is considered as being due to: ‘Consistent change’ = A real change of status due to implementation of measures or to increased/decreased pressures.‘Inconsistent due to changes to monitoring’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in monitoring (site, methodology) since the second RBMP.‘Inconsistent due to changes to assessment methods’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in the assessment methods since the second RBMPs.‘Inconsistent due to changes to monitoring and assessment methods’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in monitoring (site, methodology) and the assessment methods since the second RBMPs.Quality checks: Conditional check: Report if and only if qeStatusOrPotentialChange is ’+2’, ‘+1’, ‘-1’ or ‘-2’.
string (1)
Conditional, mandatory for qeStatusOrPotential​Change = '+2', '+1', '-1' or '-2'.
3.3.2
QE122VAL
Required. Indicate the results of the assessment of this QE for all relevant surface water categories. '1' = High status or maximum potential. '2' = Good status or potential. '3' = Moderate status or potential (for QE1) or less than good status or potential (for QE2 and QE3). '4' = Poor status or potential (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE1). '5' = Bad status or potential (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE1). 'MonitoredButNotUsed' = Monitored but no standard has been developed and/or the QE is not used for status assessment (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE2 or QE3). 'Unknown' = Unknown status or potential. 'Not applicable' = Not applicable If there is no monitoring information for this QE and/or status is unknown then select ' Unknown' from the enumeration list. If the QE is not applicable in the surface water category or type then select option 'Not applicable' from the enumeration list. Quality checks: Within-schema check: if surfaceWaterCategory is 'TeW' then 'Not applicable' must be selected. If qeCode is any quality element starting with QE1, the option 'MonitoredButNotUsed' is not valid. If qeCode is any quality element starting with QE2 or QE3, the options '4' and '5' are not valid.
string (1)
Optional
3.3.4
QE122MONP
If the QE was monitored and the classification was derived from the monitoring data available, indicate the year/period of the monitoring data which was used in the classification. LAWA-interne Festlegung: Es gelten das Datum bzw. die Jahre der Bewertung, nicht der Messung. Format: YYYY oder YYYY--YYYY.
string (10)
Conditional, mandatory for QE122VAL <> "8"
3.3.6
QE122CHANG
If information is available and there has been a change in classification since the second RBMP, report that change. If the status was reported as ‘Unknown’ in the second RBMP, report ‘Unknown2016’. Otherwise, report ‘No_information’. This covers all cases in which it is not possible to identify a change between the second and third RBMPs, for example for new water bodies.
string (1)
Conditional, mandatory for QE122VAL <> "8"
3.3.7
QE122COMP
If there has been a change in classification since the second RBMP, indicate whether the reported change in status or potential is considered as being due to: ‘Consistent change’ = A real change of status due to implementation of measures or to increased/decreased pressures.‘Inconsistent due to changes to monitoring’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in monitoring (site, methodology) since the second RBMP.‘Inconsistent due to changes to assessment methods’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in the assessment methods since the second RBMPs.‘Inconsistent due to changes to monitoring and assessment methods’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in monitoring (site, methodology) and the assessment methods since the second RBMPs.Quality checks: Conditional check: Report if and only if qeStatusOrPotentialChange is ’+2’, ‘+1’, ‘-1’ or ‘-2’.
string (1)
Conditional, mandatory for qeStatusOrPotential​Change = '+2', '+1', '-1' or '-2'.
3.6.2
QE13VAL
Required. Indicate the results of the assessment of this QE for all relevant surface water categories. '1' = High status or maximum potential. '2' = Good status or potential. '3' = Moderate status or potential (for QE1) or less than good status or potential (for QE2 and QE3). '4' = Poor status or potential (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE1). '5' = Bad status or potential (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE1). 'MonitoredButNotUsed' = Monitored but no standard has been developed and/or the QE is not used for status assessment (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE2 or QE3). 'Unknown' = Unknown status or potential. 'Not applicable' = Not applicable If there is no monitoring information for this QE and/or status is unknown then select ' Unknown' from the enumeration list. If the QE is not applicable in the surface water category or type then select option 'Not applicable' from the enumeration list. Quality checks: Within-schema check: if surfaceWaterCategory is 'TeW' then 'Not applicable' must be selected. If qeCode is any quality element starting with QE1, the option 'MonitoredButNotUsed' is not valid. If qeCode is any quality element starting with QE2 or QE3, the options '4' and '5' are not valid.
string (1)
Mandatory
3.6.4
QE13MONP
If the QE was monitored and the classification was derived from the monitoring data available, indicate the year/period of the monitoring data which was used in the classification. LAWA-interne Festlegung: Es gelten das Datum bzw. die Jahre der Bewertung, nicht der Messung. Format: YYYY oder YYYY--YYYY.
string (10)
Conditional, mandatory for QE13VAL <> "8"
3.6.6
QE13CHANG
If information is available and there has been a change in classification since the second RBMP, report that change. If the status was reported as ‘Unknown’ in the second RBMP, report ‘Unknown2016’. Otherwise, report ‘No_information’. This covers all cases in which it is not possible to identify a change between the second and third RBMPs, for example for new water bodies.
string (1)
Conditional, mandatory for QE13VAL <> "8"
3.6.7
QE13COMP
If there has been a change in classification since the second RBMP, indicate whether the reported change in status or potential is considered as being due to: ‘Consistent change’ = A real change of status due to implementation of measures or to increased/decreased pressures.‘Inconsistent due to changes to monitoring’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in monitoring (site, methodology) since the second RBMP.‘Inconsistent due to changes to assessment methods’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in the assessment methods since the second RBMPs.‘Inconsistent due to changes to monitoring and assessment methods’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in monitoring (site, methodology) and the assessment methods since the second RBMPs.Quality checks: Conditional check: Report if and only if qeStatusOrPotentialChange is ’+2’, ‘+1’, ‘-1’ or ‘-2’.
string (1)
Conditional, mandatory for qeStatusOrPotential​Change = '+2', '+1', '-1' or '-2'.
3.8.2
QE21VAL
Required. Indicate the results of the assessment of this QE for all relevant surface water categories. '1' = High status or maximum potential. '2' = Good status or potential. '3' = Moderate status or potential (for QE1) or less than good status or potential (for QE2 and QE3). '4' = Poor status or potential (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE1). '5' = Bad status or potential (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE1). 'MonitoredButNotUsed' = Monitored but no standard has been developed and/or the QE is not used for status assessment (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE2 or QE3). 'Unknown' = Unknown status or potential. 'Not applicable' = Not applicable If there is no monitoring information for this QE and/or status is unknown then select ' Unknown' from the enumeration list. If the QE is not applicable in the surface water category or type then select option 'Not applicable' from the enumeration list. Quality checks: Within-schema check: if surfaceWaterCategory is 'TeW' then 'Not applicable' must be selected. If qeCode is any quality element starting with QE1, the option 'MonitoredButNotUsed' is not valid. If qeCode is any quality element starting with QE2 or QE3, the options '4' and '5' are not valid.
string (1)
Mandatory
3.8.4
QE21MONP
If the QE was monitored and the classification was derived from the monitoring data available, indicate the year/period of the monitoring data which was used in the classification. LAWA-interne Festlegung: Es gelten das Datum bzw. die Jahre der Bewertung, nicht der Messung. Format: YYYY oder YYYY--YYYY.
string (10)
Conditional, mandatory for QE21VAL <> "8"
3.8.6
QE21CHANG
If information is available and there has been a change in classification since the second RBMP, report that change. If the status was reported as ‘Unknown’ in the second RBMP, report ‘Unknown2016’. Otherwise, report ‘No_information’. This covers all cases in which it is not possible to identify a change between the second and third RBMPs, for example for new water bodies.
string (1)
Conditional, mandatory for QE21VAL <> "8"
3.8.7
QE21COMP
If there has been a change in classification since the second RBMP, indicate whether the reported change in status or potential is considered as being due to: ‘Consistent change’ = A real change of status due to implementation of measures or to increased/decreased pressures.‘Inconsistent due to changes to monitoring’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in monitoring (site, methodology) since the second RBMP.‘Inconsistent due to changes to assessment methods’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in the assessment methods since the second RBMPs.‘Inconsistent due to changes to monitoring and assessment methods’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in monitoring (site, methodology) and the assessment methods since the second RBMPs.Quality checks: Conditional check: Report if and only if qeStatusOrPotentialChange is ’+2’, ‘+1’, ‘-1’ or ‘-2’.
string (1)
Conditional, mandatory for qeStatusOrPotential​Change = '+2', '+1', '-1' or '-2'.
3.10.2
QE23VAL
Required. Indicate the results of the assessment of this QE for all relevant surface water categories. '1' = High status or maximum potential. '2' = Good status or potential. '3' = Moderate status or potential (for QE1) or less than good status or potential (for QE2 and QE3). '4' = Poor status or potential (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE1). '5' = Bad status or potential (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE1). 'MonitoredButNotUsed' = Monitored but no standard has been developed and/or the QE is not used for status assessment (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE2 or QE3). 'Unknown' = Unknown status or potential. 'Not applicable' = Not applicable If there is no monitoring information for this QE and/or status is unknown then select ' Unknown' from the enumeration list. If the QE is not applicable in the surface water category or type then select option 'Not applicable' from the enumeration list. Quality checks: Within-schema check: if surfaceWaterCategory is 'TeW' then 'Not applicable' must be selected. If qeCode is any quality element starting with QE1, the option 'MonitoredButNotUsed' is not valid. If qeCode is any quality element starting with QE2 or QE3, the options '4' and '5' are not valid.
string (1)
Mandatory
3.10.4
QE23MONP
If the QE was monitored and the classification was derived from the monitoring data available, indicate the year/period of the monitoring data which was used in the classification. LAWA-interne Festlegung: Es gelten das Datum bzw. die Jahre der Bewertung, nicht der Messung. Format: YYYY oder YYYY--YYYY.
string (10)
Conditional, mandatory for QE23VAL <> "8"
3.10.6
QE23CHANG
If information is available and there has been a change in classification since the second RBMP, report that change. If the status was reported as ‘Unknown’ in the second RBMP, report ‘Unknown2016’. Otherwise, report ‘No_information’. This covers all cases in which it is not possible to identify a change between the second and third RBMPs, for example for new water bodies.
string (1)
Conditional, mandatory for QE23VAL <> "8"
3.10.7
QE23COMP
If there has been a change in classification since the second RBMP, indicate whether the reported change in status or potential is considered as being due to: ‘Consistent change’ = A real change of status due to implementation of measures or to increased/decreased pressures.‘Inconsistent due to changes to monitoring’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in monitoring (site, methodology) since the second RBMP.‘Inconsistent due to changes to assessment methods’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in the assessment methods since the second RBMPs.‘Inconsistent due to changes to monitoring and assessment methods’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in monitoring (site, methodology) and the assessment methods since the second RBMPs.Quality checks: Conditional check: Report if and only if qeStatusOrPotentialChange is ’+2’, ‘+1’, ‘-1’ or ‘-2’.
string (1)
Conditional, mandatory for qeStatusOrPotential​Change = '+2', '+1', '-1' or '-2'.
3.11.2
QE311VAL
Required. Indicate the results of the assessment of this QE for all relevant surface water categories. '1' = High status or maximum potential. '2' = Good status or potential. '3' = Moderate status or potential (for QE1) or less than good status or potential (for QE2 and QE3). '4' = Poor status or potential (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE1). '5' = Bad status or potential (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE1). 'MonitoredButNotUsed' = Monitored but no standard has been developed and/or the QE is not used for status assessment (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE2 or QE3). 'Unknown' = Unknown status or potential. 'Not applicable' = Not applicable If there is no monitoring information for this QE and/or status is unknown then select ' Unknown' from the enumeration list. If the QE is not applicable in the surface water category or type then select option 'Not applicable' from the enumeration list. Quality checks: Within-schema check: if surfaceWaterCategory is 'TeW' then 'Not applicable' must be selected. If qeCode is any quality element starting with QE1, the option 'MonitoredButNotUsed' is not valid. If qeCode is any quality element starting with QE2 or QE3, the options '4' and '5' are not valid.
string (1)
Mandatory
3.11.4
QE311MONP
If the QE was monitored and the classification was derived from the monitoring data available, indicate the year/period of the monitoring data which was used in the classification. LAWA-interne Festlegung: Es gelten das Datum bzw. die Jahre der Bewertung, nicht der Messung. Format: YYYY oder YYYY--YYYY.
string (10)
Conditional, mandatory for QE311VAL <> "8"
3.11.6
QE311CHANG
If information is available and there has been a change in classification since the second RBMP, report that change. If the status was reported as ‘Unknown’ in the second RBMP, report ‘Unknown2016’. Otherwise, report ‘No_information’. This covers all cases in which it is not possible to identify a change between the second and third RBMPs, for example for new water bodies.
string (1)
Conditional, mandatory for QE311VAL <> "8"
3.11.7
QE311COMP
If there has been a change in classification since the second RBMP, indicate whether the reported change in status or potential is considered as being due to: ‘Consistent change’ = A real change of status due to implementation of measures or to increased/decreased pressures.‘Inconsistent due to changes to monitoring’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in monitoring (site, methodology) since the second RBMP.‘Inconsistent due to changes to assessment methods’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in the assessment methods since the second RBMPs.‘Inconsistent due to changes to monitoring and assessment methods’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in monitoring (site, methodology) and the assessment methods since the second RBMPs.Quality checks: Conditional check: Report if and only if qeStatusOrPotentialChange is ’+2’, ‘+1’, ‘-1’ or ‘-2’.
string (1)
Conditional, mandatory for qeStatusOrPotential​Change = '+2', '+1', '-1' or '-2'.
3.12.2
QE312VAL
Required. Indicate the results of the assessment of this QE for all relevant surface water categories. '1' = High status or maximum potential. '2' = Good status or potential. '3' = Moderate status or potential (for QE1) or less than good status or potential (for QE2 and QE3). '4' = Poor status or potential (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE1). '5' = Bad status or potential (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE1). 'MonitoredButNotUsed' = Monitored but no standard has been developed and/or the QE is not used for status assessment (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE2 or QE3). 'Unknown' = Unknown status or potential. 'Not applicable' = Not applicable If there is no monitoring information for this QE and/or status is unknown then select ' Unknown' from the enumeration list. If the QE is not applicable in the surface water category or type then select option 'Not applicable' from the enumeration list. Quality checks: Within-schema check: if surfaceWaterCategory is 'TeW' then 'Not applicable' must be selected. If qeCode is any quality element starting with QE1, the option 'MonitoredButNotUsed' is not valid. If qeCode is any quality element starting with QE2 or QE3, the options '4' and '5' are not valid.
string (1)
Mandatory
3.12.4
QE312MONP
If the QE was monitored and the classification was derived from the monitoring data available, indicate the year/period of the monitoring data which was used in the classification. LAWA-interne Festlegung: Es gelten das Datum bzw. die Jahre der Bewertung, nicht der Messung. Format: YYYY oder YYYY--YYYY.
string (10)
Conditional, mandatory for QE312VAL <> "8"
3.12.6
QE312CHANG
If information is available and there has been a change in classification since the second RBMP, report that change. If the status was reported as ‘Unknown’ in the second RBMP, report ‘Unknown2016’. Otherwise, report ‘No_information’. This covers all cases in which it is not possible to identify a change between the second and third RBMPs, for example for new water bodies.
string (1)
Conditional, mandatory for QE312VAL <> "8"
3.12.7
QE312COMP
If there has been a change in classification since the second RBMP, indicate whether the reported change in status or potential is considered as being due to: ‘Consistent change’ = A real change of status due to implementation of measures or to increased/decreased pressures.‘Inconsistent due to changes to monitoring’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in monitoring (site, methodology) since the second RBMP.‘Inconsistent due to changes to assessment methods’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in the assessment methods since the second RBMPs.‘Inconsistent due to changes to monitoring and assessment methods’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in monitoring (site, methodology) and the assessment methods since the second RBMPs.Quality checks: Conditional check: Report if and only if qeStatusOrPotentialChange is ’+2’, ‘+1’, ‘-1’ or ‘-2’.
string (1)
Conditional, mandatory for qeStatusOrPotential​Change = '+2', '+1', '-1' or '-2'.
3.13.2
QE313VAL
Required. Indicate the results of the assessment of this QE for all relevant surface water categories. '1' = High status or maximum potential. '2' = Good status or potential. '3' = Moderate status or potential (for QE1) or less than good status or potential (for QE2 and QE3). '4' = Poor status or potential (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE1). '5' = Bad status or potential (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE1). 'MonitoredButNotUsed' = Monitored but no standard has been developed and/or the QE is not used for status assessment (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE2 or QE3). 'Unknown' = Unknown status or potential. 'Not applicable' = Not applicable If there is no monitoring information for this QE and/or status is unknown then select ' Unknown' from the enumeration list. If the QE is not applicable in the surface water category or type then select option 'Not applicable' from the enumeration list. Quality checks: Within-schema check: if surfaceWaterCategory is 'TeW' then 'Not applicable' must be selected. If qeCode is any quality element starting with QE1, the option 'MonitoredButNotUsed' is not valid. If qeCode is any quality element starting with QE2 or QE3, the options '4' and '5' are not valid.
string (1)
Mandatory
3.13.4
QE313MONP
If the QE was monitored and the classification was derived from the monitoring data available, indicate the year/period of the monitoring data which was used in the classification. LAWA-interne Festlegung: Es gelten das Datum bzw. die Jahre der Bewertung, nicht der Messung. Format: YYYY oder YYYY--YYYY.
string (10)
Conditional, mandatory for QE313VAL <> "8"
3.13.6
QE313CHANG
If information is available and there has been a change in classification since the second RBMP, report that change. If the status was reported as ‘Unknown’ in the second RBMP, report ‘Unknown2016’. Otherwise, report ‘No_information’. This covers all cases in which it is not possible to identify a change between the second and third RBMPs, for example for new water bodies.
string (1)
Conditional, mandatory for QE313VAL <> "8"
3.13.7
QE313COMP
If there has been a change in classification since the second RBMP, indicate whether the reported change in status or potential is considered as being due to: ‘Consistent change’ = A real change of status due to implementation of measures or to increased/decreased pressures.‘Inconsistent due to changes to monitoring’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in monitoring (site, methodology) since the second RBMP.‘Inconsistent due to changes to assessment methods’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in the assessment methods since the second RBMPs.‘Inconsistent due to changes to monitoring and assessment methods’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in monitoring (site, methodology) and the assessment methods since the second RBMPs.Quality checks: Conditional check: Report if and only if qeStatusOrPotentialChange is ’+2’, ‘+1’, ‘-1’ or ‘-2’.
string (1)
Conditional, mandatory for qeStatusOrPotential​Change = '+2', '+1', '-1' or '-2'.
3.14.2
QE314VAL
Required. Indicate the results of the assessment of this QE for all relevant surface water categories. '1' = High status or maximum potential. '2' = Good status or potential. '3' = Moderate status or potential (for QE1) or less than good status or potential (for QE2 and QE3). '4' = Poor status or potential (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE1). '5' = Bad status or potential (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE1). 'MonitoredButNotUsed' = Monitored but no standard has been developed and/or the QE is not used for status assessment (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE2 or QE3). 'Unknown' = Unknown status or potential. 'Not applicable' = Not applicable If there is no monitoring information for this QE and/or status is unknown then select ' Unknown' from the enumeration list. If the QE is not applicable in the surface water category or type then select option 'Not applicable' from the enumeration list. Quality checks: Within-schema check: if surfaceWaterCategory is 'TeW' then 'Not applicable' must be selected. If qeCode is any quality element starting with QE1, the option 'MonitoredButNotUsed' is not valid. If qeCode is any quality element starting with QE2 or QE3, the options '4' and '5' are not valid.
string (1)
Mandatory
3.14.4
QE314MONP
If the QE was monitored and the classification was derived from the monitoring data available, indicate the year/period of the monitoring data which was used in the classification. LAWA-interne Festlegung: Es gelten das Datum bzw. die Jahre der Bewertung, nicht der Messung. Format: YYYY oder YYYY--YYYY.
string (10)
Conditional, mandatory for QE314VAL <> "8"
3.14.6
QE314CHANG
If information is available and there has been a change in classification since the second RBMP, report that change. If the status was reported as ‘Unknown’ in the second RBMP, report ‘Unknown2016’. Otherwise, report ‘No_information’. This covers all cases in which it is not possible to identify a change between the second and third RBMPs, for example for new water bodies.
string (1)
Conditional, mandatory for QE314VAL <> "8"
3.14.7
QE314COMP
If there has been a change in classification since the second RBMP, indicate whether the reported change in status or potential is considered as being due to: ‘Consistent change’ = A real change of status due to implementation of measures or to increased/decreased pressures.‘Inconsistent due to changes to monitoring’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in monitoring (site, methodology) since the second RBMP.‘Inconsistent due to changes to assessment methods’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in the assessment methods since the second RBMPs.‘Inconsistent due to changes to monitoring and assessment methods’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in monitoring (site, methodology) and the assessment methods since the second RBMPs.Quality checks: Conditional check: Report if and only if qeStatusOrPotentialChange is ’+2’, ‘+1’, ‘-1’ or ‘-2’.
string (1)
Conditional, mandatory for qeStatusOrPotential​Change = '+2', '+1', '-1' or '-2'.
3.15.2
QE315VAL
Required. Indicate the results of the assessment of this QE for all relevant surface water categories. '1' = High status or maximum potential. '2' = Good status or potential. '3' = Moderate status or potential (for QE1) or less than good status or potential (for QE2 and QE3). '4' = Poor status or potential (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE1). '5' = Bad status or potential (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE1). 'MonitoredButNotUsed' = Monitored but no standard has been developed and/or the QE is not used for status assessment (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE2 or QE3). 'Unknown' = Unknown status or potential. 'Not applicable' = Not applicable If there is no monitoring information for this QE and/or status is unknown then select ' Unknown' from the enumeration list. If the QE is not applicable in the surface water category or type then select option 'Not applicable' from the enumeration list. Quality checks: Within-schema check: if surfaceWaterCategory is 'TeW' then 'Not applicable' must be selected. If qeCode is any quality element starting with QE1, the option 'MonitoredButNotUsed' is not valid. If qeCode is any quality element starting with QE2 or QE3, the options '4' and '5' are not valid.
string (1)
Mandatory
3.15.4
QE315MONP
If the QE was monitored and the classification was derived from the monitoring data available, indicate the year/period of the monitoring data which was used in the classification. LAWA-interne Festlegung: Es gelten das Datum bzw. die Jahre der Bewertung, nicht der Messung. Format: YYYY oder YYYY--YYYY.
string (10)
Conditional, mandatory for QE315VAL <> "8"
3.15.6
QE315CHANG
If information is available and there has been a change in classification since the second RBMP, report that change. If the status was reported as ‘Unknown’ in the second RBMP, report ‘Unknown2016’. Otherwise, report ‘No_information’. This covers all cases in which it is not possible to identify a change between the second and third RBMPs, for example for new water bodies.
string (1)
Conditional, mandatory for QE315VAL <> "8"
3.15.7
QE315COMP
If there has been a change in classification since the second RBMP, indicate whether the reported change in status or potential is considered as being due to: ‘Consistent change’ = A real change of status due to implementation of measures or to increased/decreased pressures.‘Inconsistent due to changes to monitoring’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in monitoring (site, methodology) since the second RBMP.‘Inconsistent due to changes to assessment methods’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in the assessment methods since the second RBMPs.‘Inconsistent due to changes to monitoring and assessment methods’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in monitoring (site, methodology) and the assessment methods since the second RBMPs.Quality checks: Conditional check: Report if and only if qeStatusOrPotentialChange is ’+2’, ‘+1’, ‘-1’ or ‘-2’.
string (1)
Conditional, mandatory for qeStatusOrPotential​Change = '+2', '+1', '-1' or '-2'.
3.16.2
QE3161VAL
Required. Indicate the results of the assessment of this QE for all relevant surface water categories. '1' = High status or maximum potential. '2' = Good status or potential. '3' = Moderate status or potential (for QE1) or less than good status or potential (for QE2 and QE3). '4' = Poor status or potential (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE1). '5' = Bad status or potential (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE1). 'MonitoredButNotUsed' = Monitored but no standard has been developed and/or the QE is not used for status assessment (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE2 or QE3). 'Unknown' = Unknown status or potential. 'Not applicable' = Not applicable If there is no monitoring information for this QE and/or status is unknown then select ' Unknown' from the enumeration list. If the QE is not applicable in the surface water category or type then select option 'Not applicable' from the enumeration list. Quality checks: Within-schema check: if surfaceWaterCategory is 'TeW' then 'Not applicable' must be selected. If qeCode is any quality element starting with QE1, the option 'MonitoredButNotUsed' is not valid. If qeCode is any quality element starting with QE2 or QE3, the options '4' and '5' are not valid.
string (1)
Mandatory
3.16.4
QE3161MONP
If the QE was monitored and the classification was derived from the monitoring data available, indicate the year/period of the monitoring data which was used in the classification. LAWA-interne Festlegung: Es gelten das Datum bzw. die Jahre der Bewertung, nicht der Messung. Format: YYYY oder YYYY--YYYY.
string (10)
Conditional, mandatory for QE3161VAL <> "8"
3.16.6
QE3161CHAN
If information is available and there has been a change in classification since the second RBMP, report that change. If the status was reported as ‘Unknown’ in the second RBMP, report ‘Unknown2016’. Otherwise, report ‘No_information’. This covers all cases in which it is not possible to identify a change between the second and third RBMPs, for example for new water bodies.
string (1)
Conditional, mandatory for QE3161VAL <> "8"
3.16.7
QE3161COMP
If there has been a change in classification since the second RBMP, indicate whether the reported change in status or potential is considered as being due to: ‘Consistent change’ = A real change of status due to implementation of measures or to increased/decreased pressures.‘Inconsistent due to changes to monitoring’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in monitoring (site, methodology) since the second RBMP.‘Inconsistent due to changes to assessment methods’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in the assessment methods since the second RBMPs.‘Inconsistent due to changes to monitoring and assessment methods’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in monitoring (site, methodology) and the assessment methods since the second RBMPs.Quality checks: Conditional check: Report if and only if qeStatusOrPotentialChange is ’+2’, ‘+1’, ‘-1’ or ‘-2’.
string (1)
Conditional, mandatory for qeStatusOrPotential​Change = '+2', '+1', '-1' or '-2'.
3.17.2
QE3162VAL
Required. Indicate the results of the assessment of this QE for all relevant surface water categories. '1' = High status or maximum potential. '2' = Good status or potential. '3' = Moderate status or potential (for QE1) or less than good status or potential (for QE2 and QE3). '4' = Poor status or potential (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE1). '5' = Bad status or potential (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE1). 'MonitoredButNotUsed' = Monitored but no standard has been developed and/or the QE is not used for status assessment (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE2 or QE3). 'Unknown' = Unknown status or potential. 'Not applicable' = Not applicable If there is no monitoring information for this QE and/or status is unknown then select ' Unknown' from the enumeration list. If the QE is not applicable in the surface water category or type then select option 'Not applicable' from the enumeration list. Quality checks: Within-schema check: if surfaceWaterCategory is 'TeW' then 'Not applicable' must be selected. If qeCode is any quality element starting with QE1, the option 'MonitoredButNotUsed' is not valid. If qeCode is any quality element starting with QE2 or QE3, the options '4' and '5' are not valid.
string (1)
Mandatory
3.17.4
QE3162MONP
If the QE was monitored and the classification was derived from the monitoring data available, indicate the year/period of the monitoring data which was used in the classification. LAWA-interne Festlegung: Es gelten das Datum bzw. die Jahre der Bewertung, nicht der Messung. Format: YYYY oder YYYY--YYYY.
string (10)
Conditional, mandatory for QE3162VAL <> "8"
3.17.6
QE3162CHAN
If information is available and there has been a change in classification since the second RBMP, report that change. If the status was reported as ‘Unknown’ in the second RBMP, report ‘Unknown2016’. Otherwise, report ‘No_information’. This covers all cases in which it is not possible to identify a change between the second and third RBMPs, for example for new water bodies.
string (1)
Conditional, mandatory for QE3162VAL <> "8"
3.17.7
QE3162COMP
If there has been a change in classification since the second RBMP, indicate whether the reported change in status or potential is considered as being due to: ‘Consistent change’ = A real change of status due to implementation of measures or to increased/decreased pressures.‘Inconsistent due to changes to monitoring’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in monitoring (site, methodology) since the second RBMP.‘Inconsistent due to changes to assessment methods’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in the assessment methods since the second RBMPs.‘Inconsistent due to changes to monitoring and assessment methods’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in monitoring (site, methodology) and the assessment methods since the second RBMPs.Quality checks: Conditional check: Report if and only if qeStatusOrPotentialChange is ’+2’, ‘+1’, ‘-1’ or ‘-2’.
string (1)
Conditional, mandatory for qeStatusOrPotential​Change = '+2', '+1', '-1' or '-2'.
3.18.2
QE33VAL
Required. Indicate the results of the assessment of this QE for all relevant surface water categories. '1' = High status or maximum potential. '2' = Good status or potential. '3' = Moderate status or potential (for QE1) or less than good status or potential (for QE2 and QE3). '4' = Poor status or potential (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE1). '5' = Bad status or potential (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE1). 'MonitoredButNotUsed' = Monitored but no standard has been developed and/or the QE is not used for status assessment (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE2 or QE3). 'Unknown' = Unknown status or potential. 'Not applicable' = Not applicable If there is no monitoring information for this QE and/or status is unknown then select ' Unknown' from the enumeration list. If the QE is not applicable in the surface water category or type then select option 'Not applicable' from the enumeration list. Quality checks: Within-schema check: if surfaceWaterCategory is 'TeW' then 'Not applicable' must be selected. If qeCode is any quality element starting with QE1, the option 'MonitoredButNotUsed' is not valid. If qeCode is any quality element starting with QE2 or QE3, the options '4' and '5' are not valid.
string (1)
Mandatory
3.18.4
QE33MONP
If the QE was monitored and the classification was derived from the monitoring data available, indicate the year/period of the monitoring data which was used in the classification. LAWA-interne Festlegung: Es gelten das Datum bzw. die Jahre der Bewertung, nicht der Messung. Format: YYYY oder YYYY--YYYY.
string (10)
Conditional, mandatory for QE33VAL <> "8"
3.18.6
QE33CHANG
If information is available and there has been a change in classification since the second RBMP, report that change. If the status was reported as ‘Unknown’ in the second RBMP, report ‘Unknown2016’. Otherwise, report ‘No_information’. This covers all cases in which it is not possible to identify a change between the second and third RBMPs, for example for new water bodies.
string (1)
Conditional, mandatory for QE33VAL <> "8"
3.18.7
QE33COMP
If there has been a change in classification since the second RBMP, indicate whether the reported change in status or potential is considered as being due to: ‘Consistent change’ = A real change of status due to implementation of measures or to increased/decreased pressures.‘Inconsistent due to changes to monitoring’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in monitoring (site, methodology) since the second RBMP.‘Inconsistent due to changes to assessment methods’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in the assessment methods since the second RBMPs.‘Inconsistent due to changes to monitoring and assessment methods’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in monitoring (site, methodology) and the assessment methods since the second RBMPs.Quality checks: Conditional check: Report if and only if qeStatusOrPotentialChange is ’+2’, ‘+1’, ‘-1’ or ‘-2’.
string (1)
Conditional, mandatory for qeStatusOrPotential​Change = '+2', '+1', '-1' or '-2'.
6.2
ECO_STAT
Classification of the ecological status of natural water bodies according to WFD annex V (1.4.2.(i))
string (1)
Conditional, mandatory for Cwcharacter Artificial = "N" and Cwcharacter HeavilyModified = "N"
6.3
ECO_POT
Einstufung des oekologischen Potentials von kuenstlichen oder erheblich veraenderten Wasserkoerpern nach WRRL-Anhang V (1.4.2.(ii))
string (1)
Conditional, mandatory for Cwcharacter Artificial = "Y" or Cwcharacter HeavilyModified = "Y"
6.14
ECO_ASSC
Required. Indicate the confidence on the chemical status assigned. '0' = No information. '1' = Low confidence. '2' = Medium confidence. '3' = High confidence. The criteria used by Member States to assess confidence vary considerably, but general guidance may be: Low = no monitoring data; Medium = limited or insufficiently robust monitoring data for some or all Priority Substances that are discharged in the RBD; High = good data for all Priority Substances that are discharged in the RBD. LAWA-interne Festlegung: es ist für DE grundsätzlich '3' für 'High confidence' einzugeben
string (1)
Mandatory
6.15
CHEM_ASSC
Required. Indicate the confidence on the chemical status assigned. ‘0’ = No information. ‘1’ = Low confidence. ‘2’ = Medium confidence. ‘3’ = High confidence. The criteria used by Member States to assess confidence vary considerably, but general guidance may be: Low = no monitoring data; Medium = limited or insufficiently robust monitoring data for some or all Priority Substances that are discharged in the RBD; High = good data for all Priority Substances that are discharged in the RBD. LAWA-interne Festlegung: es ist für DE grundsätzlich '3' für 'High confidence' einzugeben
string (1)
Mandatory
6.50
CHEM_STAT
Einstufung des chemischen Zustandes nach WRRL-Anhang V (1.4.3), Substanzen aus Annex 8d/Codeliste PS_Code
string (1)
Mandatory
Bundesanstalt für Gewässerkunde : Stand: 22.02.2023 - 11:30:53