0.0

TEMPLATE

Name der Schablone. Darf nicht veraendert werden

string (24)

Mandatory

1.0

EU_CD_CW

Internationaler Schluessel fuer CostalWaterBody. Wird zusammengesetzt aus demMemberStateCode, dem 2-stelligen Schluessel fuer die Feature class des Surface WaterBody Typs(z.B.:RW) und dem MemberStateCode_RW (Erlaeuterung s. MS_CD_RW). Schema: <MemberStateCode>_ <FeatureClassCode>_ <MS_CD_RW>

string (42)

Mandatory, primary key

2.0

RBD_CD

4-digit code fuer die Flussgebietseinheit.

string (4)

Mandatory

2.1

WA_CD

4-digit code fuer die Working Area.

string (10)

Mandatory

2.2

LAND_CD

Der CountryStateCode wird in Anlehnung an die Regelungen der DIN EN ISO 3166-1 und DIN ISO 3166-2 aus zwei Alpha-2 Schluesseln zusammen gesetzt. Der erste Teil des Schluessels entspricht dem CountryCode, der zweite Schluesselbestandteil steht fuer die Verwaltungseinheiten (Bundesland). Fuer Deutschland sind diese Verwaltungseinheiten vorgegeben. Fuer andere Laender ist der Alpha-2 Schluessel (XX) frei waehlbar.

string (4)

Mandatory, primary key

2.4

INS_WHEN

Erstellungsdatum des Datensatzes

date (8)

Mandatory

YYYYMMDD

2.5

INS_BY

Anspechpartner

string (15)

Mandatory

2.6

METADATA

Der Name der Metadatendatei ist abhaengig vom hier erfassten Gebiet. Er kann auf vier verschiedene Arten gebildet werden. Er setzt sich zusammen aus der Kurzbezeichnung fuer die Schablone, dem CountryStateCode, dem WorkAreaCode oder dem RiverBasinDistrictCode und wird um die Dateinamenserweiterung XML ergaenzt. Alle Angaben sind in Grossbuchstaben auszufuehren.Schema: <TemplateShortName>_ <CountryStateCode>_ <WorkAreaCode>.XML or <TemplateShortName>_ <CountryStateCode>_ <RiverBasinDistrictCode>.XML or <TemplateShortName>_ <CountryStateCode>.XML or <TemplateShortName>_ <WorkAreaCode>.XML Beispiel: fuer Nordrhein-Westfalen fuer den Niederrhein: COMPATH_DENW_2800.XML fuer Nordrhein-Westfalen fuer den Rhein COMPATH_DENW_2000.XML fuer Nordrhein-Westfalen: COMPATH_DENW.XML fuer das Gesamtgebiet Niederrhein: COMPATH_2800.XML

string (255)

Mandatory

3.0.2

QE11VAL

Required. Indicate the results of the assessment of this QE for all relevant surface water categories. '1' = High status or maximum potential. '2' = Good status or potential. '3' = Moderate status or potential (for QE1) or less than good status or potential (for QE2 and QE3). '4' = Poor status or potential (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE1). '5' = Bad status or potential (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE1). 'MonitoredButNotUsed' = Monitored but no standard has been developed and/or the QE is not used for status assessment (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE2 or QE3). 'Unknown' = Unknown status or potential. 'Not applicable' = Not applicable If there is no monitoring information for this QE and/or status is unknown then select ' Unknown' from the enumeration list. If the QE is not applicable in the surface water category or type then select option 'Not applicable' from the enumeration list. Quality checks: Within-schema check: if surfaceWaterCategory is 'TeW' then 'Not applicable' must be selected. If qeCode is any quality element starting with QE1, the option 'MonitoredButNotUsed' is not valid. If qeCode is any quality element starting with QE2 or QE3, the options '4' and '5' are not valid.

string (1)

Mandatory

3.0.4

QE11MONP

If the QE was monitored and the classification was derived from the monitoring data available, indicate the year/period of the monitoring data which was used in the classification. LAWA-interne Festlegung: Es gelten das Datum bzw. die Jahre der Bewertung, nicht der Messung. Format: YYYY oder YYYY--YYYY.

string (10)

Conditional, mandatory for QE11VAL <> "8"

3.0.6

QE11CHANG

If information is available and there has been a change in classification since the second RBMP, report that change. If the status was reported as ‘Unknown’ in the second RBMP, report ‘Unknown2016’. Otherwise, report ‘No_information’. This covers all cases in which it is not possible to identify a change between the second and third RBMPs, for example for new water bodies.

string (1)

Conditional, mandatory for QE11VAL <> "8"

3.0.7

QE11COMP

If there has been a change in classification since the second RBMP, indicate whether the reported change in status or potential is considered as being due to: ‘Consistent change’ = A real change of status due to implementation of measures or to increased/decreased pressures.‘Inconsistent due to changes to monitoring’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in monitoring (site, methodology) since the second RBMP.‘Inconsistent due to changes to assessment methods’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in the assessment methods since the second RBMPs.‘Inconsistent due to changes to monitoring and assessment methods’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in monitoring (site, methodology) and the assessment methods since the second RBMPs.Quality checks: Conditional check: Report if and only if qeStatusOrPotentialChange is ’+2’, ‘+1’, ‘-1’ or ‘-2’.

string (1)

Conditional, mandatory for qeStatusOrPotential​Change = '+2', '+1', '-1' or '-2'.

3.1.2

QE12VAL

Required. Indicate the results of the assessment of this QE for all relevant surface water categories. '1' = High status or maximum potential. '2' = Good status or potential. '3' = Moderate status or potential (for QE1) or less than good status or potential (for QE2 and QE3). '4' = Poor status or potential (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE1). '5' = Bad status or potential (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE1). 'MonitoredButNotUsed' = Monitored but no standard has been developed and/or the QE is not used for status assessment (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE2 or QE3). 'Unknown' = Unknown status or potential. 'Not applicable' = Not applicable If there is no monitoring information for this QE and/or status is unknown then select ' Unknown' from the enumeration list. If the QE is not applicable in the surface water category or type then select option 'Not applicable' from the enumeration list. Quality checks: Within-schema check: if surfaceWaterCategory is 'TeW' then 'Not applicable' must be selected. If qeCode is any quality element starting with QE1, the option 'MonitoredButNotUsed' is not valid. If qeCode is any quality element starting with QE2 or QE3, the options '4' and '5' are not valid.

string (1)

Mandatory

3.1.4

QE12MONP

If the QE was monitored and the classification was derived from the monitoring data available, indicate the year/period of the monitoring data which was used in the classification. LAWA-interne Festlegung: Es gelten das Datum bzw. die Jahre der Bewertung, nicht der Messung. Format: YYYY oder YYYY--YYYY.

string (10)

Conditional, mandatory for QE12VAL <> "8"

3.1.6

QE12CHANG

If information is available and there has been a change in classification since the second RBMP, report that change. If the status was reported as ‘Unknown’ in the second RBMP, report ‘Unknown2016’. Otherwise, report ‘No_information’. This covers all cases in which it is not possible to identify a change between the second and third RBMPs, for example for new water bodies.

string (1)

Conditional, mandatory for QE12VAL <> "8"

3.1.7

QE12COMP

If there has been a change in classification since the second RBMP, indicate whether the reported change in status or potential is considered as being due to: ‘Consistent change’ = A real change of status due to implementation of measures or to increased/decreased pressures.‘Inconsistent due to changes to monitoring’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in monitoring (site, methodology) since the second RBMP.‘Inconsistent due to changes to assessment methods’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in the assessment methods since the second RBMPs.‘Inconsistent due to changes to monitoring and assessment methods’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in monitoring (site, methodology) and the assessment methods since the second RBMPs.Quality checks: Conditional check: Report if and only if qeStatusOrPotentialChange is ’+2’, ‘+1’, ‘-1’ or ‘-2’.

string (1)

Conditional, mandatory for qeStatusOrPotential​Change = '+2', '+1', '-1' or '-2'.

3.2.2

QE121VAL

Required. Indicate the results of the assessment of this QE for all relevant surface water categories. '1' = High status or maximum potential. '2' = Good status or potential. '3' = Moderate status or potential (for QE1) or less than good status or potential (for QE2 and QE3). '4' = Poor status or potential (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE1). '5' = Bad status or potential (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE1). 'MonitoredButNotUsed' = Monitored but no standard has been developed and/or the QE is not used for status assessment (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE2 or QE3). 'Unknown' = Unknown status or potential. 'Not applicable' = Not applicable If there is no monitoring information for this QE and/or status is unknown then select ' Unknown' from the enumeration list. If the QE is not applicable in the surface water category or type then select option 'Not applicable' from the enumeration list. Quality checks: Within-schema check: if surfaceWaterCategory is 'TeW' then 'Not applicable' must be selected. If qeCode is any quality element starting with QE1, the option 'MonitoredButNotUsed' is not valid. If qeCode is any quality element starting with QE2 or QE3, the options '4' and '5' are not valid.

string (1)

Optional

3.2.4

QE121MONP

If the QE was monitored and the classification was derived from the monitoring data available, indicate the year/period of the monitoring data which was used in the classification. LAWA-interne Festlegung: Es gelten das Datum bzw. die Jahre der Bewertung, nicht der Messung. Format: YYYY oder YYYY--YYYY.

string (10)

Conditional, mandatory for QE121VAL <> "8"

3.2.6

QE121CHANG

If information is available and there has been a change in classification since the second RBMP, report that change. If the status was reported as ‘Unknown’ in the second RBMP, report ‘Unknown2016’. Otherwise, report ‘No_information’. This covers all cases in which it is not possible to identify a change between the second and third RBMPs, for example for new water bodies.

string (1)

Conditional, mandatory for QE121VAL <> "8"

3.2.7

QE121COMP

If there has been a change in classification since the second RBMP, indicate whether the reported change in status or potential is considered as being due to: ‘Consistent change’ = A real change of status due to implementation of measures or to increased/decreased pressures.‘Inconsistent due to changes to monitoring’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in monitoring (site, methodology) since the second RBMP.‘Inconsistent due to changes to assessment methods’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in the assessment methods since the second RBMPs.‘Inconsistent due to changes to monitoring and assessment methods’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in monitoring (site, methodology) and the assessment methods since the second RBMPs.Quality checks: Conditional check: Report if and only if qeStatusOrPotentialChange is ’+2’, ‘+1’, ‘-1’ or ‘-2’.

string (1)

Conditional, mandatory for qeStatusOrPotential​Change = '+2', '+1', '-1' or '-2'.

3.3.2

QE122VAL

Required. Indicate the results of the assessment of this QE for all relevant surface water categories. '1' = High status or maximum potential. '2' = Good status or potential. '3' = Moderate status or potential (for QE1) or less than good status or potential (for QE2 and QE3). '4' = Poor status or potential (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE1). '5' = Bad status or potential (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE1). 'MonitoredButNotUsed' = Monitored but no standard has been developed and/or the QE is not used for status assessment (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE2 or QE3). 'Unknown' = Unknown status or potential. 'Not applicable' = Not applicable If there is no monitoring information for this QE and/or status is unknown then select ' Unknown' from the enumeration list. If the QE is not applicable in the surface water category or type then select option 'Not applicable' from the enumeration list. Quality checks: Within-schema check: if surfaceWaterCategory is 'TeW' then 'Not applicable' must be selected. If qeCode is any quality element starting with QE1, the option 'MonitoredButNotUsed' is not valid. If qeCode is any quality element starting with QE2 or QE3, the options '4' and '5' are not valid.

string (1)

Optional

3.3.4

QE122MONP

If the QE was monitored and the classification was derived from the monitoring data available, indicate the year/period of the monitoring data which was used in the classification. LAWA-interne Festlegung: Es gelten das Datum bzw. die Jahre der Bewertung, nicht der Messung. Format: YYYY oder YYYY--YYYY.

string (10)

Conditional, mandatory for QE122VAL <> "8"

3.3.6

QE122CHANG

If information is available and there has been a change in classification since the second RBMP, report that change. If the status was reported as ‘Unknown’ in the second RBMP, report ‘Unknown2016’. Otherwise, report ‘No_information’. This covers all cases in which it is not possible to identify a change between the second and third RBMPs, for example for new water bodies.

string (1)

Conditional, mandatory for QE122VAL <> "8"

3.3.7

QE122COMP

If there has been a change in classification since the second RBMP, indicate whether the reported change in status or potential is considered as being due to: ‘Consistent change’ = A real change of status due to implementation of measures or to increased/decreased pressures.‘Inconsistent due to changes to monitoring’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in monitoring (site, methodology) since the second RBMP.‘Inconsistent due to changes to assessment methods’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in the assessment methods since the second RBMPs.‘Inconsistent due to changes to monitoring and assessment methods’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in monitoring (site, methodology) and the assessment methods since the second RBMPs.Quality checks: Conditional check: Report if and only if qeStatusOrPotentialChange is ’+2’, ‘+1’, ‘-1’ or ‘-2’.

string (1)

Conditional, mandatory for qeStatusOrPotential​Change = '+2', '+1', '-1' or '-2'.

3.6.2

QE13VAL

Required. Indicate the results of the assessment of this QE for all relevant surface water categories. '1' = High status or maximum potential. '2' = Good status or potential. '3' = Moderate status or potential (for QE1) or less than good status or potential (for QE2 and QE3). '4' = Poor status or potential (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE1). '5' = Bad status or potential (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE1). 'MonitoredButNotUsed' = Monitored but no standard has been developed and/or the QE is not used for status assessment (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE2 or QE3). 'Unknown' = Unknown status or potential. 'Not applicable' = Not applicable If there is no monitoring information for this QE and/or status is unknown then select ' Unknown' from the enumeration list. If the QE is not applicable in the surface water category or type then select option 'Not applicable' from the enumeration list. Quality checks: Within-schema check: if surfaceWaterCategory is 'TeW' then 'Not applicable' must be selected. If qeCode is any quality element starting with QE1, the option 'MonitoredButNotUsed' is not valid. If qeCode is any quality element starting with QE2 or QE3, the options '4' and '5' are not valid.

string (1)

Mandatory

3.6.4

QE13MONP

If the QE was monitored and the classification was derived from the monitoring data available, indicate the year/period of the monitoring data which was used in the classification. LAWA-interne Festlegung: Es gelten das Datum bzw. die Jahre der Bewertung, nicht der Messung. Format: YYYY oder YYYY--YYYY.

string (10)

Conditional, mandatory for QE13VAL <> "8"

3.6.6

QE13CHANG

If information is available and there has been a change in classification since the second RBMP, report that change. If the status was reported as ‘Unknown’ in the second RBMP, report ‘Unknown2016’. Otherwise, report ‘No_information’. This covers all cases in which it is not possible to identify a change between the second and third RBMPs, for example for new water bodies.

string (1)

Conditional, mandatory for QE13VAL <> "8"

3.6.7

QE13COMP

If there has been a change in classification since the second RBMP, indicate whether the reported change in status or potential is considered as being due to: ‘Consistent change’ = A real change of status due to implementation of measures or to increased/decreased pressures.‘Inconsistent due to changes to monitoring’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in monitoring (site, methodology) since the second RBMP.‘Inconsistent due to changes to assessment methods’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in the assessment methods since the second RBMPs.‘Inconsistent due to changes to monitoring and assessment methods’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in monitoring (site, methodology) and the assessment methods since the second RBMPs.Quality checks: Conditional check: Report if and only if qeStatusOrPotentialChange is ’+2’, ‘+1’, ‘-1’ or ‘-2’.

string (1)

Conditional, mandatory for qeStatusOrPotential​Change = '+2', '+1', '-1' or '-2'.

3.8.2

QE21VAL

Required. Indicate the results of the assessment of this QE for all relevant surface water categories. '1' = High status or maximum potential. '2' = Good status or potential. '3' = Moderate status or potential (for QE1) or less than good status or potential (for QE2 and QE3). '4' = Poor status or potential (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE1). '5' = Bad status or potential (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE1). 'MonitoredButNotUsed' = Monitored but no standard has been developed and/or the QE is not used for status assessment (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE2 or QE3). 'Unknown' = Unknown status or potential. 'Not applicable' = Not applicable If there is no monitoring information for this QE and/or status is unknown then select ' Unknown' from the enumeration list. If the QE is not applicable in the surface water category or type then select option 'Not applicable' from the enumeration list. Quality checks: Within-schema check: if surfaceWaterCategory is 'TeW' then 'Not applicable' must be selected. If qeCode is any quality element starting with QE1, the option 'MonitoredButNotUsed' is not valid. If qeCode is any quality element starting with QE2 or QE3, the options '4' and '5' are not valid.

string (1)

Mandatory

3.8.4

QE21MONP

If the QE was monitored and the classification was derived from the monitoring data available, indicate the year/period of the monitoring data which was used in the classification. LAWA-interne Festlegung: Es gelten das Datum bzw. die Jahre der Bewertung, nicht der Messung. Format: YYYY oder YYYY--YYYY.

string (10)

Conditional, mandatory for QE21VAL <> "8"

3.8.6

QE21CHANG

If information is available and there has been a change in classification since the second RBMP, report that change. If the status was reported as ‘Unknown’ in the second RBMP, report ‘Unknown2016’. Otherwise, report ‘No_information’. This covers all cases in which it is not possible to identify a change between the second and third RBMPs, for example for new water bodies.

string (1)

Conditional, mandatory for QE21VAL <> "8"

3.8.7

QE21COMP

If there has been a change in classification since the second RBMP, indicate whether the reported change in status or potential is considered as being due to: ‘Consistent change’ = A real change of status due to implementation of measures or to increased/decreased pressures.‘Inconsistent due to changes to monitoring’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in monitoring (site, methodology) since the second RBMP.‘Inconsistent due to changes to assessment methods’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in the assessment methods since the second RBMPs.‘Inconsistent due to changes to monitoring and assessment methods’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in monitoring (site, methodology) and the assessment methods since the second RBMPs.Quality checks: Conditional check: Report if and only if qeStatusOrPotentialChange is ’+2’, ‘+1’, ‘-1’ or ‘-2’.

string (1)

Conditional, mandatory for qeStatusOrPotential​Change = '+2', '+1', '-1' or '-2'.

3.10.2

QE23VAL

Required. Indicate the results of the assessment of this QE for all relevant surface water categories. '1' = High status or maximum potential. '2' = Good status or potential. '3' = Moderate status or potential (for QE1) or less than good status or potential (for QE2 and QE3). '4' = Poor status or potential (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE1). '5' = Bad status or potential (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE1). 'MonitoredButNotUsed' = Monitored but no standard has been developed and/or the QE is not used for status assessment (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE2 or QE3). 'Unknown' = Unknown status or potential. 'Not applicable' = Not applicable If there is no monitoring information for this QE and/or status is unknown then select ' Unknown' from the enumeration list. If the QE is not applicable in the surface water category or type then select option 'Not applicable' from the enumeration list. Quality checks: Within-schema check: if surfaceWaterCategory is 'TeW' then 'Not applicable' must be selected. If qeCode is any quality element starting with QE1, the option 'MonitoredButNotUsed' is not valid. If qeCode is any quality element starting with QE2 or QE3, the options '4' and '5' are not valid.

string (1)

Mandatory

3.10.4

QE23MONP

If the QE was monitored and the classification was derived from the monitoring data available, indicate the year/period of the monitoring data which was used in the classification. LAWA-interne Festlegung: Es gelten das Datum bzw. die Jahre der Bewertung, nicht der Messung. Format: YYYY oder YYYY--YYYY.

string (10)

Conditional, mandatory for QE23VAL <> "8"

3.10.6

QE23CHANG

If information is available and there has been a change in classification since the second RBMP, report that change. If the status was reported as ‘Unknown’ in the second RBMP, report ‘Unknown2016’. Otherwise, report ‘No_information’. This covers all cases in which it is not possible to identify a change between the second and third RBMPs, for example for new water bodies.

string (1)

Conditional, mandatory for QE23VAL <> "8"

3.10.7

QE23COMP

If there has been a change in classification since the second RBMP, indicate whether the reported change in status or potential is considered as being due to: ‘Consistent change’ = A real change of status due to implementation of measures or to increased/decreased pressures.‘Inconsistent due to changes to monitoring’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in monitoring (site, methodology) since the second RBMP.‘Inconsistent due to changes to assessment methods’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in the assessment methods since the second RBMPs.‘Inconsistent due to changes to monitoring and assessment methods’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in monitoring (site, methodology) and the assessment methods since the second RBMPs.Quality checks: Conditional check: Report if and only if qeStatusOrPotentialChange is ’+2’, ‘+1’, ‘-1’ or ‘-2’.

string (1)

Conditional, mandatory for qeStatusOrPotential​Change = '+2', '+1', '-1' or '-2'.

3.11.2

QE311VAL

Required. Indicate the results of the assessment of this QE for all relevant surface water categories. '1' = High status or maximum potential. '2' = Good status or potential. '3' = Moderate status or potential (for QE1) or less than good status or potential (for QE2 and QE3). '4' = Poor status or potential (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE1). '5' = Bad status or potential (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE1). 'MonitoredButNotUsed' = Monitored but no standard has been developed and/or the QE is not used for status assessment (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE2 or QE3). 'Unknown' = Unknown status or potential. 'Not applicable' = Not applicable If there is no monitoring information for this QE and/or status is unknown then select ' Unknown' from the enumeration list. If the QE is not applicable in the surface water category or type then select option 'Not applicable' from the enumeration list. Quality checks: Within-schema check: if surfaceWaterCategory is 'TeW' then 'Not applicable' must be selected. If qeCode is any quality element starting with QE1, the option 'MonitoredButNotUsed' is not valid. If qeCode is any quality element starting with QE2 or QE3, the options '4' and '5' are not valid.

string (1)

Mandatory

3.11.4

QE311MONP

If the QE was monitored and the classification was derived from the monitoring data available, indicate the year/period of the monitoring data which was used in the classification. LAWA-interne Festlegung: Es gelten das Datum bzw. die Jahre der Bewertung, nicht der Messung. Format: YYYY oder YYYY--YYYY.

string (10)

Conditional, mandatory for QE311VAL <> "8"

3.11.6

QE311CHANG

If information is available and there has been a change in classification since the second RBMP, report that change. If the status was reported as ‘Unknown’ in the second RBMP, report ‘Unknown2016’. Otherwise, report ‘No_information’. This covers all cases in which it is not possible to identify a change between the second and third RBMPs, for example for new water bodies.

string (1)

Conditional, mandatory for QE311VAL <> "8"

3.11.7

QE311COMP

If there has been a change in classification since the second RBMP, indicate whether the reported change in status or potential is considered as being due to: ‘Consistent change’ = A real change of status due to implementation of measures or to increased/decreased pressures.‘Inconsistent due to changes to monitoring’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in monitoring (site, methodology) since the second RBMP.‘Inconsistent due to changes to assessment methods’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in the assessment methods since the second RBMPs.‘Inconsistent due to changes to monitoring and assessment methods’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in monitoring (site, methodology) and the assessment methods since the second RBMPs.Quality checks: Conditional check: Report if and only if qeStatusOrPotentialChange is ’+2’, ‘+1’, ‘-1’ or ‘-2’.

string (1)

Conditional, mandatory for qeStatusOrPotential​Change = '+2', '+1', '-1' or '-2'.

3.12.2

QE312VAL

Required. Indicate the results of the assessment of this QE for all relevant surface water categories. '1' = High status or maximum potential. '2' = Good status or potential. '3' = Moderate status or potential (for QE1) or less than good status or potential (for QE2 and QE3). '4' = Poor status or potential (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE1). '5' = Bad status or potential (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE1). 'MonitoredButNotUsed' = Monitored but no standard has been developed and/or the QE is not used for status assessment (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE2 or QE3). 'Unknown' = Unknown status or potential. 'Not applicable' = Not applicable If there is no monitoring information for this QE and/or status is unknown then select ' Unknown' from the enumeration list. If the QE is not applicable in the surface water category or type then select option 'Not applicable' from the enumeration list. Quality checks: Within-schema check: if surfaceWaterCategory is 'TeW' then 'Not applicable' must be selected. If qeCode is any quality element starting with QE1, the option 'MonitoredButNotUsed' is not valid. If qeCode is any quality element starting with QE2 or QE3, the options '4' and '5' are not valid.

string (1)

Mandatory

3.12.4

QE312MONP

If the QE was monitored and the classification was derived from the monitoring data available, indicate the year/period of the monitoring data which was used in the classification. LAWA-interne Festlegung: Es gelten das Datum bzw. die Jahre der Bewertung, nicht der Messung. Format: YYYY oder YYYY--YYYY.

string (10)

Conditional, mandatory for QE312VAL <> "8"

3.12.6

QE312CHANG

If information is available and there has been a change in classification since the second RBMP, report that change. If the status was reported as ‘Unknown’ in the second RBMP, report ‘Unknown2016’. Otherwise, report ‘No_information’. This covers all cases in which it is not possible to identify a change between the second and third RBMPs, for example for new water bodies.

string (1)

Conditional, mandatory for QE312VAL <> "8"

3.12.7

QE312COMP

If there has been a change in classification since the second RBMP, indicate whether the reported change in status or potential is considered as being due to: ‘Consistent change’ = A real change of status due to implementation of measures or to increased/decreased pressures.‘Inconsistent due to changes to monitoring’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in monitoring (site, methodology) since the second RBMP.‘Inconsistent due to changes to assessment methods’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in the assessment methods since the second RBMPs.‘Inconsistent due to changes to monitoring and assessment methods’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in monitoring (site, methodology) and the assessment methods since the second RBMPs.Quality checks: Conditional check: Report if and only if qeStatusOrPotentialChange is ’+2’, ‘+1’, ‘-1’ or ‘-2’.

string (1)

Conditional, mandatory for qeStatusOrPotential​Change = '+2', '+1', '-1' or '-2'.

3.13.2

QE313VAL

Required. Indicate the results of the assessment of this QE for all relevant surface water categories. '1' = High status or maximum potential. '2' = Good status or potential. '3' = Moderate status or potential (for QE1) or less than good status or potential (for QE2 and QE3). '4' = Poor status or potential (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE1). '5' = Bad status or potential (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE1). 'MonitoredButNotUsed' = Monitored but no standard has been developed and/or the QE is not used for status assessment (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE2 or QE3). 'Unknown' = Unknown status or potential. 'Not applicable' = Not applicable If there is no monitoring information for this QE and/or status is unknown then select ' Unknown' from the enumeration list. If the QE is not applicable in the surface water category or type then select option 'Not applicable' from the enumeration list. Quality checks: Within-schema check: if surfaceWaterCategory is 'TeW' then 'Not applicable' must be selected. If qeCode is any quality element starting with QE1, the option 'MonitoredButNotUsed' is not valid. If qeCode is any quality element starting with QE2 or QE3, the options '4' and '5' are not valid.

string (1)

Mandatory

3.13.4

QE313MONP

If the QE was monitored and the classification was derived from the monitoring data available, indicate the year/period of the monitoring data which was used in the classification. LAWA-interne Festlegung: Es gelten das Datum bzw. die Jahre der Bewertung, nicht der Messung. Format: YYYY oder YYYY--YYYY.

string (10)

Conditional, mandatory for QE313VAL <> "8"

3.13.6

QE313CHANG

If information is available and there has been a change in classification since the second RBMP, report that change. If the status was reported as ‘Unknown’ in the second RBMP, report ‘Unknown2016’. Otherwise, report ‘No_information’. This covers all cases in which it is not possible to identify a change between the second and third RBMPs, for example for new water bodies.

string (1)

Conditional, mandatory for QE313VAL <> "8"

3.13.7

QE313COMP

If there has been a change in classification since the second RBMP, indicate whether the reported change in status or potential is considered as being due to: ‘Consistent change’ = A real change of status due to implementation of measures or to increased/decreased pressures.‘Inconsistent due to changes to monitoring’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in monitoring (site, methodology) since the second RBMP.‘Inconsistent due to changes to assessment methods’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in the assessment methods since the second RBMPs.‘Inconsistent due to changes to monitoring and assessment methods’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in monitoring (site, methodology) and the assessment methods since the second RBMPs.Quality checks: Conditional check: Report if and only if qeStatusOrPotentialChange is ’+2’, ‘+1’, ‘-1’ or ‘-2’.

string (1)

Conditional, mandatory for qeStatusOrPotential​Change = '+2', '+1', '-1' or '-2'.

3.14.2

QE314VAL

Required. Indicate the results of the assessment of this QE for all relevant surface water categories. '1' = High status or maximum potential. '2' = Good status or potential. '3' = Moderate status or potential (for QE1) or less than good status or potential (for QE2 and QE3). '4' = Poor status or potential (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE1). '5' = Bad status or potential (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE1). 'MonitoredButNotUsed' = Monitored but no standard has been developed and/or the QE is not used for status assessment (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE2 or QE3). 'Unknown' = Unknown status or potential. 'Not applicable' = Not applicable If there is no monitoring information for this QE and/or status is unknown then select ' Unknown' from the enumeration list. If the QE is not applicable in the surface water category or type then select option 'Not applicable' from the enumeration list. Quality checks: Within-schema check: if surfaceWaterCategory is 'TeW' then 'Not applicable' must be selected. If qeCode is any quality element starting with QE1, the option 'MonitoredButNotUsed' is not valid. If qeCode is any quality element starting with QE2 or QE3, the options '4' and '5' are not valid.

string (1)

Mandatory

3.14.4

QE314MONP

If the QE was monitored and the classification was derived from the monitoring data available, indicate the year/period of the monitoring data which was used in the classification. LAWA-interne Festlegung: Es gelten das Datum bzw. die Jahre der Bewertung, nicht der Messung. Format: YYYY oder YYYY--YYYY.

string (10)

Conditional, mandatory for QE314VAL <> "8"

3.14.6

QE314CHANG

If information is available and there has been a change in classification since the second RBMP, report that change. If the status was reported as ‘Unknown’ in the second RBMP, report ‘Unknown2016’. Otherwise, report ‘No_information’. This covers all cases in which it is not possible to identify a change between the second and third RBMPs, for example for new water bodies.

string (1)

Conditional, mandatory for QE314VAL <> "8"

3.14.7

QE314COMP

If there has been a change in classification since the second RBMP, indicate whether the reported change in status or potential is considered as being due to: ‘Consistent change’ = A real change of status due to implementation of measures or to increased/decreased pressures.‘Inconsistent due to changes to monitoring’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in monitoring (site, methodology) since the second RBMP.‘Inconsistent due to changes to assessment methods’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in the assessment methods since the second RBMPs.‘Inconsistent due to changes to monitoring and assessment methods’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in monitoring (site, methodology) and the assessment methods since the second RBMPs.Quality checks: Conditional check: Report if and only if qeStatusOrPotentialChange is ’+2’, ‘+1’, ‘-1’ or ‘-2’.

string (1)

Conditional, mandatory for qeStatusOrPotential​Change = '+2', '+1', '-1' or '-2'.

3.15.2

QE315VAL

Required. Indicate the results of the assessment of this QE for all relevant surface water categories. '1' = High status or maximum potential. '2' = Good status or potential. '3' = Moderate status or potential (for QE1) or less than good status or potential (for QE2 and QE3). '4' = Poor status or potential (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE1). '5' = Bad status or potential (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE1). 'MonitoredButNotUsed' = Monitored but no standard has been developed and/or the QE is not used for status assessment (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE2 or QE3). 'Unknown' = Unknown status or potential. 'Not applicable' = Not applicable If there is no monitoring information for this QE and/or status is unknown then select ' Unknown' from the enumeration list. If the QE is not applicable in the surface water category or type then select option 'Not applicable' from the enumeration list. Quality checks: Within-schema check: if surfaceWaterCategory is 'TeW' then 'Not applicable' must be selected. If qeCode is any quality element starting with QE1, the option 'MonitoredButNotUsed' is not valid. If qeCode is any quality element starting with QE2 or QE3, the options '4' and '5' are not valid.

string (1)

Mandatory

3.15.4

QE315MONP

If the QE was monitored and the classification was derived from the monitoring data available, indicate the year/period of the monitoring data which was used in the classification. LAWA-interne Festlegung: Es gelten das Datum bzw. die Jahre der Bewertung, nicht der Messung. Format: YYYY oder YYYY--YYYY.

string (10)

Conditional, mandatory for QE315VAL <> "8"

3.15.6

QE315CHANG

If information is available and there has been a change in classification since the second RBMP, report that change. If the status was reported as ‘Unknown’ in the second RBMP, report ‘Unknown2016’. Otherwise, report ‘No_information’. This covers all cases in which it is not possible to identify a change between the second and third RBMPs, for example for new water bodies.

string (1)

Conditional, mandatory for QE315VAL <> "8"

3.15.7

QE315COMP

If there has been a change in classification since the second RBMP, indicate whether the reported change in status or potential is considered as being due to: ‘Consistent change’ = A real change of status due to implementation of measures or to increased/decreased pressures.‘Inconsistent due to changes to monitoring’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in monitoring (site, methodology) since the second RBMP.‘Inconsistent due to changes to assessment methods’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in the assessment methods since the second RBMPs.‘Inconsistent due to changes to monitoring and assessment methods’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in monitoring (site, methodology) and the assessment methods since the second RBMPs.Quality checks: Conditional check: Report if and only if qeStatusOrPotentialChange is ’+2’, ‘+1’, ‘-1’ or ‘-2’.

string (1)

Conditional, mandatory for qeStatusOrPotential​Change = '+2', '+1', '-1' or '-2'.

3.16.2

QE3161VAL

Required. Indicate the results of the assessment of this QE for all relevant surface water categories. '1' = High status or maximum potential. '2' = Good status or potential. '3' = Moderate status or potential (for QE1) or less than good status or potential (for QE2 and QE3). '4' = Poor status or potential (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE1). '5' = Bad status or potential (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE1). 'MonitoredButNotUsed' = Monitored but no standard has been developed and/or the QE is not used for status assessment (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE2 or QE3). 'Unknown' = Unknown status or potential. 'Not applicable' = Not applicable If there is no monitoring information for this QE and/or status is unknown then select ' Unknown' from the enumeration list. If the QE is not applicable in the surface water category or type then select option 'Not applicable' from the enumeration list. Quality checks: Within-schema check: if surfaceWaterCategory is 'TeW' then 'Not applicable' must be selected. If qeCode is any quality element starting with QE1, the option 'MonitoredButNotUsed' is not valid. If qeCode is any quality element starting with QE2 or QE3, the options '4' and '5' are not valid.

string (1)

Mandatory

3.16.4

QE3161MONP

If the QE was monitored and the classification was derived from the monitoring data available, indicate the year/period of the monitoring data which was used in the classification. LAWA-interne Festlegung: Es gelten das Datum bzw. die Jahre der Bewertung, nicht der Messung. Format: YYYY oder YYYY--YYYY.

string (10)

Conditional, mandatory for QE3161VAL <> "8"

3.16.6

QE3161CHAN

If information is available and there has been a change in classification since the second RBMP, report that change. If the status was reported as ‘Unknown’ in the second RBMP, report ‘Unknown2016’. Otherwise, report ‘No_information’. This covers all cases in which it is not possible to identify a change between the second and third RBMPs, for example for new water bodies.

string (1)

Conditional, mandatory for QE3161VAL <> "8"

3.16.7

QE3161COMP

If there has been a change in classification since the second RBMP, indicate whether the reported change in status or potential is considered as being due to: ‘Consistent change’ = A real change of status due to implementation of measures or to increased/decreased pressures.‘Inconsistent due to changes to monitoring’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in monitoring (site, methodology) since the second RBMP.‘Inconsistent due to changes to assessment methods’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in the assessment methods since the second RBMPs.‘Inconsistent due to changes to monitoring and assessment methods’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in monitoring (site, methodology) and the assessment methods since the second RBMPs.Quality checks: Conditional check: Report if and only if qeStatusOrPotentialChange is ’+2’, ‘+1’, ‘-1’ or ‘-2’.

string (1)

Conditional, mandatory for qeStatusOrPotential​Change = '+2', '+1', '-1' or '-2'.

3.17.2

QE3162VAL

Required. Indicate the results of the assessment of this QE for all relevant surface water categories. '1' = High status or maximum potential. '2' = Good status or potential. '3' = Moderate status or potential (for QE1) or less than good status or potential (for QE2 and QE3). '4' = Poor status or potential (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE1). '5' = Bad status or potential (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE1). 'MonitoredButNotUsed' = Monitored but no standard has been developed and/or the QE is not used for status assessment (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE2 or QE3). 'Unknown' = Unknown status or potential. 'Not applicable' = Not applicable If there is no monitoring information for this QE and/or status is unknown then select ' Unknown' from the enumeration list. If the QE is not applicable in the surface water category or type then select option 'Not applicable' from the enumeration list. Quality checks: Within-schema check: if surfaceWaterCategory is 'TeW' then 'Not applicable' must be selected. If qeCode is any quality element starting with QE1, the option 'MonitoredButNotUsed' is not valid. If qeCode is any quality element starting with QE2 or QE3, the options '4' and '5' are not valid.

string (1)

Mandatory

3.17.4

QE3162MONP

If the QE was monitored and the classification was derived from the monitoring data available, indicate the year/period of the monitoring data which was used in the classification. LAWA-interne Festlegung: Es gelten das Datum bzw. die Jahre der Bewertung, nicht der Messung. Format: YYYY oder YYYY--YYYY.

string (10)

Conditional, mandatory for QE3162VAL <> "8"

3.17.6

QE3162CHAN

If information is available and there has been a change in classification since the second RBMP, report that change. If the status was reported as ‘Unknown’ in the second RBMP, report ‘Unknown2016’. Otherwise, report ‘No_information’. This covers all cases in which it is not possible to identify a change between the second and third RBMPs, for example for new water bodies.

string (1)

Conditional, mandatory for QE3162VAL <> "8"

3.17.7

QE3162COMP

If there has been a change in classification since the second RBMP, indicate whether the reported change in status or potential is considered as being due to: ‘Consistent change’ = A real change of status due to implementation of measures or to increased/decreased pressures.‘Inconsistent due to changes to monitoring’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in monitoring (site, methodology) since the second RBMP.‘Inconsistent due to changes to assessment methods’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in the assessment methods since the second RBMPs.‘Inconsistent due to changes to monitoring and assessment methods’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in monitoring (site, methodology) and the assessment methods since the second RBMPs.Quality checks: Conditional check: Report if and only if qeStatusOrPotentialChange is ’+2’, ‘+1’, ‘-1’ or ‘-2’.

string (1)

Conditional, mandatory for qeStatusOrPotential​Change = '+2', '+1', '-1' or '-2'.

3.18.2

QE33VAL

Required. Indicate the results of the assessment of this QE for all relevant surface water categories. '1' = High status or maximum potential. '2' = Good status or potential. '3' = Moderate status or potential (for QE1) or less than good status or potential (for QE2 and QE3). '4' = Poor status or potential (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE1). '5' = Bad status or potential (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE1). 'MonitoredButNotUsed' = Monitored but no standard has been developed and/or the QE is not used for status assessment (this option is only valid for quality elements starting with QE2 or QE3). 'Unknown' = Unknown status or potential. 'Not applicable' = Not applicable If there is no monitoring information for this QE and/or status is unknown then select ' Unknown' from the enumeration list. If the QE is not applicable in the surface water category or type then select option 'Not applicable' from the enumeration list. Quality checks: Within-schema check: if surfaceWaterCategory is 'TeW' then 'Not applicable' must be selected. If qeCode is any quality element starting with QE1, the option 'MonitoredButNotUsed' is not valid. If qeCode is any quality element starting with QE2 or QE3, the options '4' and '5' are not valid.

string (1)

Mandatory

3.18.4

QE33MONP

If the QE was monitored and the classification was derived from the monitoring data available, indicate the year/period of the monitoring data which was used in the classification. LAWA-interne Festlegung: Es gelten das Datum bzw. die Jahre der Bewertung, nicht der Messung. Format: YYYY oder YYYY--YYYY.

string (10)

Conditional, mandatory for QE33VAL <> "8"

3.18.6

QE33CHANG

If information is available and there has been a change in classification since the second RBMP, report that change. If the status was reported as ‘Unknown’ in the second RBMP, report ‘Unknown2016’. Otherwise, report ‘No_information’. This covers all cases in which it is not possible to identify a change between the second and third RBMPs, for example for new water bodies.

string (1)

Conditional, mandatory for QE33VAL <> "8"

3.18.7

QE33COMP

If there has been a change in classification since the second RBMP, indicate whether the reported change in status or potential is considered as being due to: ‘Consistent change’ = A real change of status due to implementation of measures or to increased/decreased pressures.‘Inconsistent due to changes to monitoring’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in monitoring (site, methodology) since the second RBMP.‘Inconsistent due to changes to assessment methods’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in the assessment methods since the second RBMPs.‘Inconsistent due to changes to monitoring and assessment methods’ = The reported change is due to a significant change in monitoring (site, methodology) and the assessment methods since the second RBMPs.Quality checks: Conditional check: Report if and only if qeStatusOrPotentialChange is ’+2’, ‘+1’, ‘-1’ or ‘-2’.

string (1)

Conditional, mandatory for qeStatusOrPotential​Change = '+2', '+1', '-1' or '-2'.

6.2

ECO_STAT

Classification of the ecological status of natural water bodies according to WFD annex V (1.4.2.(i))

string (1)

Conditional, mandatory for Cwcharacter Artificial = "N" and Cwcharacter HeavilyModified = "N"

6.3

ECO_POT

Einstufung des oekologischen Potentials von kuenstlichen oder erheblich veraenderten Wasserkoerpern nach WRRL-Anhang V (1.4.2.(ii))

string (1)

Conditional, mandatory for Cwcharacter Artificial = "Y" or Cwcharacter HeavilyModified = "Y"

6.14

ECO_ASSC

Required. Indicate the confidence on the chemical status assigned. '0' = No information. '1' = Low confidence. '2' = Medium confidence. '3' = High confidence. The criteria used by Member States to assess confidence vary considerably, but general guidance may be: Low = no monitoring data; Medium = limited or insufficiently robust monitoring data for some or all Priority Substances that are discharged in the RBD; High = good data for all Priority Substances that are discharged in the RBD. LAWA-interne Festlegung: es ist für DE grundsätzlich '3' für 'High confidence' einzugeben

string (1)

Mandatory

6.15

CHEM_ASSC

Required. Indicate the confidence on the chemical status assigned. ‘0’ = No information. ‘1’ = Low confidence. ‘2’ = Medium confidence. ‘3’ = High confidence. The criteria used by Member States to assess confidence vary considerably, but general guidance may be: Low = no monitoring data; Medium = limited or insufficiently robust monitoring data for some or all Priority Substances that are discharged in the RBD; High = good data for all Priority Substances that are discharged in the RBD. LAWA-interne Festlegung: es ist für DE grundsätzlich '3' für 'High confidence' einzugeben

string (1)

Mandatory

6.50

CHEM_STAT

Einstufung des chemischen Zustandes nach WRRL-Anhang V (1.4.3), Substanzen aus Annex 8d/Codeliste PS_Code

string (1)

Mandatory